{"id":36688,"date":"2021-08-09T19:44:01","date_gmt":"2021-08-09T22:44:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/?p=36688"},"modified":"2025-03-17T12:02:18","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T15:02:18","slug":"vitoria-juridica-do-cbr-em-acao-movida-contra-o-conter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/vitoria-juridica-do-cbr-em-acao-movida-contra-o-conter\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal victory of CBR in lawsuit filed against CONTER"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Brazilian College of Radiology and Imaging Diagnostics obtained, in a lawsuit filed against the National Council of Radiology Technicians, a favorable decision that determined the suspension of the effects of CONTER Resolution No. 10\/2021.<\/p>\n<p>The said decision, issued under Case No. 1052546-97.2021.4.01.3400, pending before the 13th Federal Civil Court of the SJDF, understood \u201cthat CONTER Resolution No. 10\/2021 apparently innovated in the legal system, going beyond its competence, extending the interpretation of RDC Anvisa n\u00ba 330\/2019 to allow technicians and technologists to be Technical Responsible for radiological procedures\u201d. He also pointed out that the aforementioned Resolution, apparently, violates Article 5, II, of Law No. 12,842\/2013.<\/p>\n<p>CONTER will now be summoned urgently to comply with the decision.<\/p>\n<p>Read the decision in full here:<br \/>\n<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/vitoriajuridicadocbr-conter\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/vitoriajuridicadocbr-conter<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Brazilian College of Radiology and Imaging Diagnostics obtained, in a lawsuit filed against the National Council of Radiology Technicians, a favorable decision that determined the suspension of the effects of CONTER Resolution No. 10\/2021. Said decision, issued under Proceeding No. 1052546-97.2021.4.01.3400, pending before the 13th Federal Civil Court of the SJDF, understood \u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/vitoria-juridica-do-cbr-em-acao-movida-contra-o-conter\/\">Keep reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":36699,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[493,4],"tags":[50,665,723,6,678,701],"class_list":["post-36688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cbr-sociedade","category-defesa-profissional","tag-cbr","tag-cbr_radiologia","tag-conter","tag-defesa-profissional","tag-medicina-diagnostica-2","tag-medico-radiologista-3"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36688"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50914,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36688\/revisions\/50914"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}