{"id":54366,"date":"2026-01-12T15:27:18","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T18:27:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/?p=54366"},"modified":"2026-01-13T09:41:58","modified_gmt":"2026-01-13T12:41:58","slug":"cbr-emite-parecer-tecnico-juridico-referente-obrigatoriedade-da-assinatura-do-medico-radiologista-nos-laudos-de-exames-de-pet-ct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/cbr-emite-parecer-tecnico-juridico-referente-obrigatoriedade-da-assinatura-do-medico-radiologista-nos-laudos-de-exames-de-pet-ct\/","title":{"rendered":"CBR issues technical-legal opinion regarding the mandatory signature of the radiologist on PET\/CT scan reports.\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging (CBR) issued a technical-legal opinion last Thursday (January 8) regarding the mandatory signature of the radiologist on reports of Positron Emission Tomography associated with Computed Tomography (PET\/CT) examinations.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/cbr-marca-presenca-em-mais-uma-edicao-do-rsna\/\">Read more: CBR makes its presence felt at another edition of RSNA<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The College affirms that the signature of the radiologist, along with that of the nuclear medicine physician, is indisputably mandatory on PET\/CT reports, as an expression of the principle of specialization, the personal nature of the medical act, and the sanitary governance applicable to diagnostic imaging services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Brazilian College of Radiology (CBR) emphasizes that the absence of the radiologist&#039;s signature when there is a tomographic component to be correlated compromises patient safety and the legal security of the procedure, and may constitute an ethical infraction and give rise to civil, administrative, and disciplinary liability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Stay on top of CBR&#039;s social networks, follow us on&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/cbr_radiologia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Instagram&nbsp;<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CBRadiologia\/?locale=pt_BR\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Facebook<\/a>&nbsp;It is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/br.linkedin.com\/company\/colegiobrasileiroderadiologiaediagn%C3%B3sticoporimagem\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">LinkedIn<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/01_PARECER-JURIDICO-sobre-obrigatoriedade-de-Assinatura-do-Especialista-de-Radiologia-nos-Laudos-de-PET-CT.pdf\">Read the full opinion!<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging (CBR) issued a technical-legal opinion last Thursday (January 8th) regarding the mandatory signature of the radiologist on reports of Positron Emission Tomography\/Computed Tomography (PET\/CT) exams. +Read more: CBR makes its presence felt at another edition of RSNA\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/cbr-emite-parecer-tecnico-juridico-referente-obrigatoriedade-da-assinatura-do-medico-radiologista-nos-laudos-de-exames-de-pet-ct\/\">Keep reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":54367,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sem-categoria"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54366"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54379,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54366\/revisions\/54379"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbr.org.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}